Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich
MT-Karelin (RUS), 2011 · Result ½–½ · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus Keuter (2498)
- Black
- Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich (2333)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- MT-Karelin (RUS)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus Keuter (2498) and Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich (2333) was played at MT-Karelin (RUS) in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus Keuter games or Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich games? This Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich?
Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus Keuter vs Anatoly Ivanovich Gulevich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.