Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise
Oberliga East B 2005/06, 2005 · Result 1–0 · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Bernhard Kettler (2283)
- Black
- Martin Weise (2175)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Oberliga East B 2005/06
- Year
- 2005
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Bernhard Kettler (2283) and Martin Weise (2175) was played at Oberliga East B 2005/06 in 2005 and finished 1–0. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Bernhard Kettler games or Martin Weise games? This Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise?
Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise (2005) finished 1–0, a win for Bernhard Kettler.
What opening was played in Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Bernhard Kettler vs Martin Weise, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.