Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel
Corr EU, 1989 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ketonen
- Black
- Bennit Schendel
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Corr EU
- Year
- 1989
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ketonen and Bennit Schendel was played at Corr EU in 1989 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ketonen games or Bennit Schendel games? This Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel?
Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel (1989) finished 1–0, a win for Ketonen.
What opening was played in Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Two Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ketonen vs Bennit Schendel, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.