Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong
Australian Open 2013, 2013 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Kethro (1785)
- Black
- Liong-On Mark Choong (1940)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Australian Open 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Kethro (1785) and Liong-On Mark Choong (1940) was played at Australian Open 2013 in 2013 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (E91). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Kethro games or Liong-On Mark Choong games? This Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong?
Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong (2013) finished 0–1, a win for Liong-On Mark Choong.
What opening was played in Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation (ECO E91).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Kethro vs Liong-On Mark Choong, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.