Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal
3. NECOSS All Nepal Classical, 2024 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki (1759)
- Black
- Purushottam Silwal (2046)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 3. NECOSS All Nepal Classical
- Year
- 2024
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki (1759) and Purushottam Silwal (2046) was played at 3. NECOSS All Nepal Classical in 2024 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed (B23). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki games or Purushottam Silwal games? This Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal?
Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal (2024) finished 0–1, a win for Purushottam Silwal.
What opening was played in Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed (ECO B23).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jeet Bahadur Kepchhaki vs Purushottam Silwal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.