Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc
Czestochowa ch-POL junior, 1992 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Kempinski (2315)
- Black
- Tomasz Muc (2245)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Czestochowa ch-POL junior
- Year
- 1992
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Kempinski (2315) and Tomasz Muc (2245) was played at Czestochowa ch-POL junior in 1992 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Kempinski games or Tomasz Muc games? This Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc?
Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc (1992) finished 0–1, a win for Tomasz Muc.
What opening was played in Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Kempinski vs Tomasz Muc, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.