Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas
2012 · Result 0–1 · Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Kemmler (1987)
- Black
- Andreas Basilius Gikas (2210)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Kemmler (1987) and Andreas Basilius Gikas (2210) was played in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (D14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Kemmler games or Andreas Basilius Gikas games? This Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas?
Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Andreas Basilius Gikas.
What opening was played in Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line (ECO D14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Kemmler vs Andreas Basilius Gikas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.