Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen
FIN Team Ch, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Matti Keloharju (1924)
- Black
- Veikko Kohonen
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- FIN Team Ch
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59)
About this chess game
This chess game between Matti Keloharju (1924) and Veikko Kohonen was played at FIN Team Ch and finished ½–½. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (C59). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Matti Keloharju games or Veikko Kohonen games? This Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen?
Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense, Suhle Defense (ECO C59).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Matti Keloharju vs Veikko Kohonen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.