Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank
Mittelfranken Team Ch 0405, 2004 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus Kelm (1861)
- Black
- Klaus Rank (1682)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Mittelfranken Team Ch 0405
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus Kelm (1861) and Klaus Rank (1682) was played at Mittelfranken Team Ch 0405 in 2004 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus Kelm games or Klaus Rank games? This Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank?
Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank (2004) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus Kelm vs Klaus Rank, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.