Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih
2016 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Kelemen (1723)
- Black
- Julian Kleih (1887)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Kelemen (1723) and Julian Kleih (1887) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (B39). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Kelemen games or Julian Kleih games? This Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih?
Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind, Breyer Variation (ECO B39).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Kelemen vs Julian Kleih, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.