Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet
FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000011, 2010 · Result 0–1 · Center Game: Normal Variation (C22).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yulian Kehayov (1115)
- Black
- Daniel Edward Parmet (1893)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000011
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Center Game: Normal Variation (C22)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yulian Kehayov (1115) and Daniel Edward Parmet (1893) was played at FICGS__CHESS__UNRATED_TOURNAMENT__000011 in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Center Game: Normal Variation (C22). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yulian Kehayov games or Daniel Edward Parmet games? This Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Center Game: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet?
Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Daniel Edward Parmet.
What opening was played in Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet?
The game opened with the Center Game: Normal Variation (ECO C22).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yulian Kehayov vs Daniel Edward Parmet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.