Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir
Hastings Masters 2024/25 98th, 2025 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (B65).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leo A Keely (1899)
- Black
- Andrew J Muir (2194)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Hastings Masters 2024/25 98th
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (B65)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leo A Keely (1899) and Andrew J Muir (2194) was played at Hastings Masters 2024/25 98th in 2025 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (B65). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leo A Keely games or Andrew J Muir games? This Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir?
Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir (2025) finished 0–1, a win for Andrew J Muir.
What opening was played in Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Rauzer Attack (ECO B65).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leo A Keely vs Andrew J Muir, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.