Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer
Hastings Masters 2018-19, 2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Raymond J Kearsley (1579)
- Black
- David W Fryer (1932)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Hastings Masters 2018-19
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40)
About this chess game
This chess game between Raymond J Kearsley (1579) and David W Fryer (1932) was played at Hastings Masters 2018-19 in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (D40). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Raymond J Kearsley games or David W Fryer games? This Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer?
Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer (2018) finished 0–1, a win for David W Fryer.
What opening was played in Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Semi-Tarrasch Defense (ECO D40).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Raymond J Kearsley vs David W Fryer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.