Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko
Moscow Region Ch Open, 2004 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Kazakov (2423)
- Black
- Alexey Shevchenko (2213)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Moscow Region Ch Open
- Year
- 2004
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Kazakov (2423) and Alexey Shevchenko (2213) was played at Moscow Region Ch Open in 2004 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Kazakov games or Alexey Shevchenko games? This Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko?
Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko (2004) finished 0–1, a win for Alexey Shevchenko.
What opening was played in Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Kazakov vs Alexey Shevchenko, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.