Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin
2002 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anastasia Kazakevich (1970)
- Black
- Steven Hamblin (1731)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2002
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anastasia Kazakevich (1970) and Steven Hamblin (1731) was played in 2002 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (D27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anastasia Kazakevich games or Steven Hamblin games? This Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin?
Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin (2002) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Classical Defense, Russian Gambit (ECO D27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anastasia Kazakevich vs Steven Hamblin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.