Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas
25. Panevezys Open, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kazimieras Katinas (1641)
- Black
- Vladislovas Kviliunas (1861)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 25. Panevezys Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kazimieras Katinas (1641) and Vladislovas Kviliunas (1861) was played at 25. Panevezys Open in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (A51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kazimieras Katinas games or Vladislovas Kviliunas games? This Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas?
Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Vladislovas Kviliunas.
What opening was played in Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Budapest Defense (ECO A51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kazimieras Katinas vs Vladislovas Kviliunas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.