Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter
2019 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Twan Kastelijn (1984)
- Black
- Arthur De Winter (1932)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97)
About this chess game
This chess game between Twan Kastelijn (1984) and Arthur De Winter (1932) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (E97). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Twan Kastelijn games or Arthur De Winter games? This Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter?
Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense (ECO E97).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Twan Kastelijn vs Arthur De Winter, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.