Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski
Botvinnik 100. Open, 2011 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ruslan Kashtanov (2360)
- Black
- Daniil Lintchevski (2553)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Botvinnik 100. Open
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ruslan Kashtanov (2360) and Daniil Lintchevski (2553) was played at Botvinnik 100. Open in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (E71). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ruslan Kashtanov games or Daniil Lintchevski games? This Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski?
Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Daniil Lintchevski.
What opening was played in Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation (ECO E71).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ruslan Kashtanov vs Daniil Lintchevski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.