Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues
7. SESC Caioba Open 2023, 2023 · Result 0–1 · Scotch Game (C45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luiz Guilherme Kapp (1502)
- Black
- Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues (1680)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 7. SESC Caioba Open 2023
- Year
- 2023
- Opening
- Scotch Game (C45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luiz Guilherme Kapp (1502) and Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues (1680) was played at 7. SESC Caioba Open 2023 in 2023 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Scotch Game (C45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luiz Guilherme Kapp games or Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues games? This Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Scotch Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues?
Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues (2023) finished 0–1, a win for Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues.
What opening was played in Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues?
The game opened with the Scotch Game (ECO C45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luiz Guilherme Kapp vs Julliano de Araujo Rodrigues, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.