Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak
Cseppko op-B, 1999 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Robert Kapas (2030)
- Black
- Norbert Zabiak (2035)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Cseppko op-B
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27)
About this chess game
This chess game between Robert Kapas (2030) and Norbert Zabiak (2035) was played at Cseppko op-B in 1999 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (A27). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Robert Kapas games or Norbert Zabiak games? This Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak?
Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak (1999) finished 0–1, a win for Norbert Zabiak.
What opening was played in Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Three Knights System (ECO A27).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Robert Kapas vs Norbert Zabiak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.