Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen
Xtracon Chess Open 2016, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jan Kalveus (1773)
- Black
- Gunnar Stake-Larsen (2034)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Xtracon Chess Open 2016
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jan Kalveus (1773) and Gunnar Stake-Larsen (2034) was played at Xtracon Chess Open 2016 in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jan Kalveus games or Gunnar Stake-Larsen games? This Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen?
Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jan Kalveus.
What opening was played in Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jan Kalveus vs Gunnar Stake-Larsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.