Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant
Corr IECG 2 mt, 1996 · Result ½–½ · Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation, Fischer Variation (E45).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Nigel J Kalton
- Black
- Steven Grant (2285)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Corr IECG 2 mt
- Year
- 1996
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation, Fischer Variation (E45)
About this chess game
This chess game between Nigel J Kalton and Steven Grant (2285) was played at Corr IECG 2 mt in 1996 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation, Fischer Variation (E45). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Nigel J Kalton games or Steven Grant games? This Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation, Fischer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant?
Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant (1996) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation, Fischer Variation (ECO E45).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Nigel J Kalton vs Steven Grant, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.