Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros
37. Trade Fair Open A, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michal Kalod (1815)
- Black
- Ludek Meszaros (2124)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 37. Trade Fair Open A
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michal Kalod (1815) and Ludek Meszaros (2124) was played at 37. Trade Fair Open A in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michal Kalod games or Ludek Meszaros games? This Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros?
Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Michal Kalod.
What opening was played in Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (ECO B82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michal Kalod vs Ludek Meszaros, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.