Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov
2011 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valentin Kalistov (1729)
- Black
- Valery Krashenov (1862)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valentin Kalistov (1729) and Valery Krashenov (1862) was played in 2011 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valentin Kalistov games or Valery Krashenov games? This Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov?
Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov (2011) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valentin Kalistov vs Valery Krashenov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.