Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov
2009 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Aleksandr Kalinin (2114)
- Black
- Aleksei Kozlov (2152)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Aleksandr Kalinin (2114) and Aleksei Kozlov (2152) was played in 2009 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Aleksandr Kalinin games or Aleksei Kozlov games? This Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov?
Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov (2009) finished 1–0, a win for Aleksandr Kalinin.
What opening was played in Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Aleksandr Kalinin vs Aleksei Kozlov, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.