Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina
Alberta Ch women, 2012 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Regina Veronicka Kalaydina (1928)
- Black
- Nina Kalaydina
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Alberta Ch women
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Regina Veronicka Kalaydina (1928) and Nina Kalaydina was played at Alberta Ch women in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Regina Veronicka Kalaydina games or Nina Kalaydina games? This Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina?
Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Regina Veronicka Kalaydina.
What opening was played in Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Regina Veronicka Kalaydina vs Nina Kalaydina, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.