Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova
Moscow Ch sf women, date unknown · Result ½–½ · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Larisa Kalashnikova (2090)
- Black
- Nadezhda Kalashnikova (2135)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Moscow Ch sf women
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Larisa Kalashnikova (2090) and Nadezhda Kalashnikova (2135) was played at Moscow Ch sf women and finished ½–½. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (C48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Larisa Kalashnikova games or Nadezhda Kalashnikova games? This Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova?
Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation (ECO C48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Larisa Kalashnikova vs Nadezhda Kalashnikova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.