David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan
77. ch-ARM 1. League, 2016 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (D83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Kalashian (2373)
- Black
- Shant Sargsyan (2429)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 77. ch-ARM 1. League
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (D83)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Kalashian (2373) and Shant Sargsyan (2429) was played at 77. ch-ARM 1. League in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (D83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Kalashian games or Shant Sargsyan games? This David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan?
David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan (2016) finished 1–0, a win for David Kalashian.
What opening was played in David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Brinckmann Attack, Grünfeld Gambit (ECO D83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Kalashian vs Shant Sargsyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.