Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky
Novosibirsk RUS, Sukharev Mem 2011, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Konstantin Kachkin (2031)
- Black
- Nikolai Pozharsky (2130)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Novosibirsk RUS, Sukharev Mem 2011
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26)
About this chess game
This chess game between Konstantin Kachkin (2031) and Nikolai Pozharsky (2130) was played at Novosibirsk RUS, Sukharev Mem 2011 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (C26). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Konstantin Kachkin games or Nikolai Pozharsky games? This Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky?
Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Konstantin Kachkin.
What opening was played in Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Falkbeer Variation (ECO C26).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Konstantin Kachkin vs Nikolai Pozharsky, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.