Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen
FIN-chT2 0506, 2006 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- Black
- Esa Taivainen
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- FIN-chT2 0506
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83)
About this chess game
This chess game between Juha Matti Juurikainen and Esa Taivainen was played at FIN-chT2 0506 in 2006 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (E83). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Juha Matti Juurikainen games or Esa Taivainen games? This Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen?
Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen (2006) finished 1–0, a win for Juha Matti Juurikainen.
What opening was played in Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Yates Defense (ECO E83).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Juha Matti Juurikainen vs Esa Taivainen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.