Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen
2016 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Stefan Junker (1834)
- Black
- Bernd Daverkausen (2128)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Stefan Junker (1834) and Bernd Daverkausen (2128) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (E67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Stefan Junker games or Bernd Daverkausen games? This Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen?
Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Bernd Daverkausen.
What opening was played in Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Fianchetto (ECO E67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Stefan Junker vs Bernd Daverkausen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.