Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz
2016 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Jung (1819)
- Black
- Hans Georg Goertz (1989)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Jung (1819) and Hans Georg Goertz (1989) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (A36). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Jung games or Hans Georg Goertz games? This Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz?
Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Hans Georg Goertz.
What opening was played in Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Ultra-Symmetrical Variation (ECO A36).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Jung vs Hans Georg Goertz, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.