Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne
Dresden (19.07.-27.07), date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Jugow (2198)
- Black
- Peter Hoehne (1789)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Dresden (19.07.-27.07)
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Jugow (2198) and Peter Hoehne (1789) was played at Dresden (19.07.-27.07) and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (B57). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Jugow games or Peter Hoehne games? This Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne?
Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Jugow.
What opening was played in Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation, Anti-Sozin Variation (ECO B57).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Jugow vs Peter Hoehne, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.