Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez
ESP/TC8/2B (ESP), 2011 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Larsen Attack (A01).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonio Juárez de Vena (1913)
- Black
- Amable Martinez Martinez (1933)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ESP/TC8/2B (ESP)
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack (A01)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonio Juárez de Vena (1913) and Amable Martinez Martinez (1933) was played at ESP/TC8/2B (ESP) in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Larsen Attack (A01). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonio Juárez de Vena games or Amable Martinez Martinez games? This Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Larsen Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez?
Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Antonio Juárez de Vena.
What opening was played in Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Larsen Attack (ECO A01).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonio Juárez de Vena vs Amable Martinez Martinez, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.