Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic
Winter Open, 2008 · Result ½–½ · King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alek Jovanovic (1607)
- Black
- Rade Scepanovic (2284)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- Winter Open
- Year
- 2008
- Opening
- King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alek Jovanovic (1607) and Rade Scepanovic (2284) was played at Winter Open in 2008 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (C38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alek Jovanovic games or Rade Scepanovic games? This Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic?
Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic (2008) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic?
The game opened with the King's Gambit Accepted: Philidor Gambit, Schultz Variation (ECO C38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alek Jovanovic vs Rade Scepanovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.