Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman
23. World Seniors 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Torp Jorgensen (1705)
- Black
- Leif Bohman (1880)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 23. World Seniors 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Torp Jorgensen (1705) and Leif Bohman (1880) was played at 23. World Seniors 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (D15). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Torp Jorgensen games or Leif Bohman games? This Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman?
Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Torp Jorgensen.
What opening was played in Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman?
The game opened with the Slav Defense: Three Knights Variation (ECO D15).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Torp Jorgensen vs Leif Bohman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.