Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson
Skakmot odlinga 2015, 2015 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Olafur Gisli Jonsson (1900)
- Black
- Kjartan Ingvarsson (1838)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Skakmot odlinga 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Olafur Gisli Jonsson (1900) and Kjartan Ingvarsson (1838) was played at Skakmot odlinga 2015 in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Olafur Gisli Jonsson games or Kjartan Ingvarsson games? This Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson?
Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Olafur Gisli Jonsson.
What opening was played in Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Olafur Gisli Jonsson vs Kjartan Ingvarsson, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.