Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal
2017 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sylvia Johnsen (1962)
- Black
- Arn-Tore Haugsdal (2043)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sylvia Johnsen (1962) and Arn-Tore Haugsdal (2043) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (A16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sylvia Johnsen games or Arn-Tore Haugsdal games? This Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal?
Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Arn-Tore Haugsdal.
What opening was played in Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Knight Variation (ECO A16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sylvia Johnsen vs Arn-Tore Haugsdal, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.