Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom
2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roland 1961 Johansson (1906)
- Black
- Jonas Sandbom (2139)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roland 1961 Johansson (1906) and Jonas Sandbom (2139) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (B82). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roland 1961 Johansson games or Jonas Sandbom games? This Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom?
Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Matanovic Attack (ECO B82).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roland 1961 Johansson vs Jonas Sandbom, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.