John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea
NOR/SC2019 (NOR), 2019 · Result ½–½ · Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John Martin Johansen (2331)
- Black
- Per Lea (1729)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- NOR/SC2019 (NOR)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78)
About this chess game
This chess game between John Martin Johansen (2331) and Per Lea (1729) was played at NOR/SC2019 (NOR) in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (D78). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John Martin Johansen games or Per Lea games? This John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea?
John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea?
The game opened with the Neo-Grünfeld Defense: Classical Variation, Original Defense (ECO D78).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John Martin Johansen vs Per Lea, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.