Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron
ch-PAR 2019, 2019 · Result ½–½ · Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (A67).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky (1843)
- Black
- Antonio Almiron (2372)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- ch-PAR 2019
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (A67)
About this chess game
This chess game between Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky (1843) and Antonio Almiron (2372) was played at ch-PAR 2019 in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (A67). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky games or Antonio Almiron games? This Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron?
Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron?
The game opened with the Benoni Defense: Taimanov Variation (ECO A67).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Paulo Leonardo Jodorcovsky vs Antonio Almiron, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.