Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado
3. ITT JAHV McGREGOR, 2012 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo Andres Jimenez (1886)
- Black
- Fabio A Hurtado (2127)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 3. ITT JAHV McGREGOR
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Andres Jimenez (1886) and Fabio A Hurtado (2127) was played at 3. ITT JAHV McGREGOR in 2012 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (B21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Andres Jimenez games or Fabio A Hurtado games? This Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado?
Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado (2012) finished 0–1, a win for Fabio A Hurtado.
What opening was played in Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: McDonnell Attack (ECO B21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Andres Jimenez vs Fabio A Hurtado, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.