Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde
SACT6001RC Eclipse, date unknown · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Francisco Jimenez (1800)
- Black
- Jose Antonio Conde (2155)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- SACT6001RC Eclipse
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Francisco Jimenez (1800) and Jose Antonio Conde (2155) was played at SACT6001RC Eclipse and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Francisco Jimenez games or Jose Antonio Conde games? This Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde?
Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Francisco Jimenez vs Jose Antonio Conde, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.