Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra
2016 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valentin Jimenez Anders (1860)
- Black
- Juan Gaya Llodra (2207)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valentin Jimenez Anders (1860) and Juan Gaya Llodra (2207) was played in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valentin Jimenez Anders games or Juan Gaya Llodra games? This Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra?
Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valentin Jimenez Anders vs Juan Gaya Llodra, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.