Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera
2017 · Result ½–½ · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jorge Jimenez Acosta (1890)
- Black
- Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera (1758)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jorge Jimenez Acosta (1890) and Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera (1758) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jorge Jimenez Acosta games or Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera games? This Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera?
Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jorge Jimenez Acosta vs Pedro J. Velazquez Rivera, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.