Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva
2015 · Result 1–0 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Zhaoyi Jiang (1861)
- Black
- Adel Talyspaeva (1708)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Zhaoyi Jiang (1861) and Adel Talyspaeva (1708) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (E58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Zhaoyi Jiang games or Adel Talyspaeva games? This Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva?
Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Zhaoyi Jiang.
What opening was played in Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Bernstein Defense, Exchange Line (ECO E58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Zhaoyi Jiang vs Adel Talyspaeva, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.