Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga
2016 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jozsef Jeszenszky (2049)
- Black
- Zsolt Varga (2010)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jozsef Jeszenszky (2049) and Zsolt Varga (2010) was played in 2016 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (B75). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jozsef Jeszenszky games or Zsolt Varga games? This Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga?
Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga (2016) finished 1–0, a win for Jozsef Jeszenszky.
What opening was played in Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack, Early Deviations (ECO B75).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jozsef Jeszenszky vs Zsolt Varga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.