John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes
Thessaloniki olm, 1984 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- John Jarecki (2235)
- Black
- Jonathan Hawes (2205)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Thessaloniki olm
- Year
- 1984
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84)
About this chess game
This chess game between John Jarecki (2235) and Jonathan Hawes (2205) was played at Thessaloniki olm in 1984 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (B84). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more John Jarecki games or Jonathan Hawes games? This John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes?
John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes (1984) finished 1–0, a win for John Jarecki.
What opening was played in John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Classical Variation (ECO B84).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of John Jarecki vs Jonathan Hawes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.