Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika
CZE/SpringCup03 (CZE), 2019 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Martin Jarabinský (2399)
- Black
- Václav Stika (2057)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CZE/SpringCup03 (CZE)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Martin Jarabinský (2399) and Václav Stika (2057) was played at CZE/SpringCup03 (CZE) in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (C49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Martin Jarabinský games or Václav Stika games? This Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika?
Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Václav Stika.
What opening was played in Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation, Double Spanish (ECO C49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Martin Jarabinský vs Václav Stika, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.