Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich
SM-00072, 2009 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ervin Janosi (1329)
- Black
- Sergey Bancevich (2233)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- SM-00072
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ervin Janosi (1329) and Sergey Bancevich (2233) was played at SM-00072 in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ervin Janosi games or Sergey Bancevich games? This Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich?
Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Sergey Bancevich.
What opening was played in Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ervin Janosi vs Sergey Bancevich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.